News Archive (6192)
The Jackson City Council and Planning Commission held a joint meeting Monday night to review the recent changes to the Jackson Draft Land Use Element. Changes to the document were made from a compilation of recommendations from local organizations and public comments from prior city council meetings. One important section of the element that was significantly updated concerned growth within the city. The document now states that “growth in the City of Jackson shall occur only if new development adequately mitigates its environmental impacts, addresses housing availability and affordability needs, and respects open space resources…” This new update to the land use element is a considerable improvement over the previous statement, which simply referred to growth in Jackson that “is not detrimental to its neighborhoods.” Concerned Citizens of Jackson, a local government watchdog group, has been involved with the update process and seemed pleased with the updates made to the element.
The usability of local parks was also updated in the element. The proposed land use element requires that developers “shall provide park areas within reasonable walking distance to all residences.” Terri Works posed the question of whether these “pocket parks” were really useful as compared to a larger, regional park that could be used by the community. Works referred to the neighborhood park in the Woodside development behind Raley’s, saying they “don’t seem really useful.” Jointly, the council and the commission decided to modify that rule to include only those developments with eight or more units and extend the walking time to 10 minutes.
Board’s Deadlock Means They Will Not Participate In Arbitration
Written byA special joint meeting between the Board of Supervisors and the Amador Water Agency, or AWA, was held yesterday at the County Offices. The meeting was open to the public. The two parties discussed- but did not take any action -on a number of water and wastewater matters currently affecting the county. Supervisor Richard Forster was present and played “host” throughout the proceedings. Matters pertaining to water issues included discussion of new developments, the status of the water supply for Carbondale Industrial Park, the water supply pipeline to the City of Plymouth, and the proposed Wild and Scenic River designation for the Mokelumne River.
Debbie Dunn was on hand to represent the Foothill Conservancy, which has been pushing for the Mokelumne’s Wild and Scenic designation. Pros and Cons for Wild and Scenic status were discussed, including the relative ease or difficulty such a designation would make for the Water Agency in implementing future regulations upon that portion of the river. In reference to wastewater issues, AWA general manager Jim Abercrombie talked about the capacity of the Sutter Creek Plant. There was also some talk about the Camanche area and taking drinking water over the hill to a landowner’s property. This decision could be affected by the presence of the California Tiger Salamander, which has been discovered within a mile of the area.
The Environmental Protection Agency is interested in how the Salamander’s habitat will be affected. A final discussion occurred between Dunn and Abercrombie concerning the wastewater capacity at the Airport. Dunn, a representative of the Airport Committee and its ongoing renovations and improvements to the airport, seemed surprised when Abercrombie remarked that the AWA has no to little further wastewater capacity available for the airport to use. Discussions will continue at future meetings.
Jackson Discusses The Cost To Citizens To Treat Waste Water In The Future
Written byProposed amendments to a bill that could loosen restrictions on Indian uses of public land are being opposed by the Board of Supervisors. The proposed amendments could provide Native American tribes or tribal groups with the authority to seek immediate cancellation of the Williamson Act contract by qualifying a myriad of new uses on public land in public interest. In other words, it would loosen the regulations on activities that could be viewed as publicly beneficial on lands in which Tribes have an interest. “This indicates one more time that some powerful sovereign people realize that by using our legislation they can gain more power,” said activist Debbie Dunn during public comment at yesterday’s Board of Supervisors meeting. Supervisor Louis Boitano focused on the long term perspective when referring to what could be more lax regulations against tribal development. “Smaller, financially strapped counties wouldn’t have the resources to go into the cost of litigation- like us,” he said. In addition, members of the California State Association of Counties wrote a letter to State Assemblyman Tony Mendoza, who introduced the amendments.
The letter states: “These proposed amendments are in conflict with this policy and make a mockery of the County’s most successful voluntary farmland conservatory program.” The California Land Conservation Act of 1965--commonly referred to as the Williamson Act--enables local governments to enter into contracts with private landowners for the purpose of restricting specific parcels of land to agricultural or related open space use. In return, landowners receive property tax assessments which are much lower than normal because they are based upon farming and open space uses as opposed to full market value. The Board unanimously voted against the amendments.
After the Amador County Board of Supervisors deadlocked over approval of the Intergovernmental Services Agreement, or ISA, drafted by Tribal and County staff over months of negotiations, the Buena Vista Tribe yesterday announced it will file a demand for binding arbitration, as provided for under its Tribal-State Gaming Compact signed with Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. Under rules set up in the Compact and by both parties, the County and the Tribe had until March 18, 2008, at midnight to submit to each other their respective last, best written offers for purposes of arbitration.
Yesterday, the Tribe submitted its last, best written offer to the County. However, the County advised the Tribe yesterday that it will not be submitting an offer to the Tribe. Furthermore, the County stated it will not be participating in the arbitration proceedings. "As the County has acknowledged, the earlier-negotiated ISA offered the County terms and mitigation measures that went well beyond those required by the Compact," said John Tang, CEO of the Buena Vista Rancheria. "Our last, best written offer made to the County yesterday, and the only one that will be before the arbitrator, is nearly identical to the one previously negotiated. We could have made substantial and justifiable changes to the ISA that would have been much more favorable to the Tribe, but chose not to. Half the Supervisors who voted supported the negotiated ISA. We want to build on that.” An arbitrator will be selected in the coming weeks and it is expected that the arbitrator will issue an award by the end of April.