News Archive (6192)
The Proposed Wicklow Way Subdivision was again the topic of discussion at Amador County’s Technical Advisory Committee meeting last week. Planner Heather Anderson advised everyone that all changes from the last TAC meeting had been incorporated into the project’s mitigation measures and conditions draft documents. Lemke Construction Director of Planning Susan Larson attended to answer any questions, but most departments involved with the project indicated the need for more time to review the finalized drafts. All agreed that bringing the item back to TAC in two weeks would provide sufficient time for review. If a finalized draft is agreed upon at that time, the committee will recommend approval to the Amador County Planning Commission, which will hold a series of public hearings on the documents. The Wicklow project, which has been in the works for four to five years according to Larson, would be located up above the K-Mart and Wal-Mart stores in the Martell area. And in regards to the project’s Final Environmental Impact Report, that document will be discussed at a public hearing at tomorrow night’s Planning Commission meeting, to be held at 7 PM at 810 Court Street in the Board of Supervisors chambers. A copy of the Final EIR is available on the county’s website at www.co.amador.ca.us/Depts/planning.
Shy of a quorum, the Amador Regional Planning Committee had an informal meeting last week and directed staff to prepare a presentation on profit sharing for the next meeting, Oct. 2. The location of the next meeting is to be determined, said Mike Daly, city manager of Jackson and a staffer for the Committee. Only one of the five members attended, Tim Murphy of the Sutter Creek City Council, while alternate member, Jackson Mayor Rosalie Pryor-Escamilla attended in the place of Vice Mayor Connie Gonsalves. Committee members absent were Supervisor Louis Boitano, Ione Mayor Andrea Bonham and public member Elida Malick of Fiddletown. Ione City Manager Kim Kerr brought a packet of revenue sharing research she had compiled, with attendees including Sutter Creek Planning Commissioner Frank Kuhna and Plymouth Vice Mayor Patricia Fordyce.
In the research, Kerr said was the Twin Cities, Minnesota, Fiscal Disparities Program that began in 1976. She said the 7-county area of Minneapolis and St. Paul had 300 taxing jurisdictions that contributed 40 percent of commercial tax base into an area-wide pool. Part of the report, by BBC Research & Consulting, said an area-wide tax rate is calculated using “weighted average local property tax rates of all participating jurisdictions in the previous year.” Revenue was shared “based on each municipality’s aggregate property value per capita compared to the area-wide average property value per capita.” The formula was criticized for not considering service needs, which some municipalities wanted to be added to disbursement based on “indicators of need, such as poverty rates and age of housing stock.” Kerr said the Twin Cities program shared 406.8 Million Dollars in property tax revenue in 2000. Pryor-Escamilla said revenue sharing would allow industrial projects to locate where appropriate and preserve the small-town ambiance. Kerr said the object of the committee and profit sharing is to attract businesses to Amador County, saying “we can’t do it as individuals, we have to do it together.” Kerr said she was looking for direction and Murphy asked if she would volunteer to put the 83-page report into a presentation for the committee’s Oct. 2nd meeting. The location of the meeting is to be determined.
By Holly Boitano -
Tuesday Sutter Creek city officials and the public got the rundown on two topics that have the potential to make or break the Gold Rush Ranch and Golf Resort: money and wastewater. City Attorney Dennis Crabb outlined the Development Agreement process, saying developers will offer the City some “public benefits” it will provide in exchange for project impacts. The contract may span 5-25 years, and use benchmarks and checkpoints to insure adherence by both parties. Crabb said the disadvantage of a development agreement was inflexibility in the face of unforeseen change. He said the City must carefully sort the issues and terms of the contract before signing it. Throughout the discussion, Councilman Pat Crosby repeatedly said, above all else, the Development Agreement should be the Council’s top consideration, contrasting Mayor Gary Wooten’s stance -- to consider dollars in conjunction with other aspects of the planning process. Members of the public said the Development Agreement should be negotiated in conjunction with the city’s general plan, now being updated. Others said the cost of public benefits would be applied as credit toward developer impact fees.
The topic switched to wastewater, with City Manager Rob Duke and consultant Rob Williams summarizing the project’s wastewater history. They also reviewed the City’s options in the areas of wastewater planning, golf course development, improvements to the current treatment system, and funding. In the end, public officials requested a spreadsheet that outlines the City’s options for wastewater disposal, in comparison with options for Gold Rush’s development. City officials also chose to slightly decrease the pace of the Gold Rush meeting schedule, cancelling a meeting at the end of September. The next meeting, 7-9 p.m. Monday, September 8 in the City Auditorium, will be for the Planning Commission to discuss the Gold Rush Draft Environmental Impact Report.