Sutter Creek Considers "Old-Time" Signage
Senator Cox Recognized For Helping Rural Communities
Joint Water Committee Discusses New Septic Law
Amador County – The Amador Joint Water Committee discussed upcoming law that deals with septic tanks on an individual level and plan to have the item on an upcoming agenda. State Assembly Bill 885, signed by Governor Gray Davis in 2000, begat the law, which the state Regional Water Quality Control Board will implement by July 2010. Amador Water Agency General Manager Jim Abercrombie said it will govern “Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems,” or individual septic systems. State regulations would be accompanied by fees. A Draft Environmental Impact Report, released in November 2008, lists project objectives “Based on the requirements of AB 885 and the intent of the state legislature in drafting the legislation.” Those include adopting Onsite Wastewater Treatment System “regulations and a statewide conditional waiver” and helping “to ensure that public health and beneficial uses of the state’s waters are protected from (septic) effluent discharges.” The objective notes that regulations and the waiver “consider economic costs, practical considerations for implementation, and technological capabilities.”
The DEIR was subject of statewide public workshops, which concluded yesterday with a meeting in Eureka. Amador Joint Water Committee member John Plasse said the legislation originated in Santa Barbara County. The DEIR notes that the California Environmental Quality Act requires that the EIR identify areas of controversy known to the lead agency, including issues raised by agencies and the public. The DEIR said: “In general, areas of potential controversy known to the State Water Board include” the “the need for consistent statewide regulations.” Other issues included monitoring and “questions about the need for and applicability of domestic well monitoring,” and the “increased cost to develop property, and the increased cost for local agencies of enforcing the regulations.” Joint Committee member Terence Moore and the committee agreed that AB 885 should be on an upcoming joint water committee agenda. A public hearing on the DEIR is set for 1:30 p.m. Monday, February 9th at the Byron Sher Auditorium, in the California EPA Building, 1001 “I” Street in Sacramento. Story by Jim Reece (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.).
ACTC Picks Chair, Vice Chair, Discusses Indian Grinding Rock
Ard Conducts First Meeting As Ione Mayor
Possible Jackson Smoking Ban Causes Controversy
Amador County – A controversial smoking ban under consideration by the Jackson City Council is being discussed at the same time as many local health officials continue a public campaign warning of the dangers of secondhand smoke. Supporters of the ban feel that smokers may offend visitors and increase health problems on a street already suffering image and economic troubles. Although the ban has only gone as far as open discussion, some smokers are already up in arms. “No matter what restrictions they put in place, they will never be able to keep smokers from doing their business, or just doing it somewhere else,” said one Jackson resident who works downtown. But some health officials believe the risks justify regulation. “The good news is that, unlike some public health hazards, secondhand smoke exposure is easily prevented,” said Diana Evensen of Tobacco Reduction of Amador County. She added, “Smoke-free environments are proven, simple approaches that prevent exposure and harm.”
According to the U.S Surgeon General’s comprehensive scientific report on the effects of secondhand smoke released in 2006 and referenced by the Amador Health Department, nonsmokers who are exposed to secondhand smoke inhale many of the same toxins as smokers. Even brief exposure to secondhand smoke has immediate adverse effects on the cardiovascular system and increases the risk for heart disease and lung cancer, the report says. “The report is a crucial warning to nonsmokers and smokers alike,” said Dr. Bob Hartmann, Amador County Health officer. But citizens who feel smoking restrictions are a violation of their personal rights are standing up against the possible ordinance. One downtown smoker put it bluntly: “If you don’t want to smell my smoke, just get out of my way, and I will tolerate things I don’t approve of you doing.” Story by Alex Lane (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.).