Sutter Creek Reviews Gold Rush Ranch DEIR
The Sutter Creek Planning Commission met last Wednesday and commented on another six chapters of the Gold Rush Ranch & Golf Resort Draft Environmental Impact Report. A laundry list of categories drew some public comment and remarks from the commission. In the public services and facilities element, staff found the EIR sufficient in that, like the city’s General Plan requires, Gold Rush will pay its fair share of new, improved or expanded public services and facilities. Likewise, the developers will fund improvements to the collection and treatment systems to keep pace with needs. In the safety element, Anders Hauge, consultant for the city, said that no open mine shafts were found on the Gold Rush property, but they would go look again just to be sure. The General Plan requires capping any such shafts. Staff found that sufficient soil investigation had been completed at the site. Staff also found that FEMA had not designated the site a 100-year flood plain. The report said “Hilly topography and drainage within existing swales, Stony Creek, and tributaries within the site minimize the potential for flooding.” Findings also said the project will control peak flow runoff such that it does not significantly add to flooding hazards. Chairman of the commission Robin Peters asked about language placing fire hydrants in wildland fire areas of the property. Hauge said the intent was to get hydrants out in some of the hundreds of acres of open space areas, to meet fire suppression requirements in the General Plan. The project will provide peak fire flows of 1,500 gallons per minute. On the noise element, Commissioner Mike Kirkley said that constraints of the project put conflicting land uses – housing – close to the noise of the existing SPI wood mill in the area. A consultant for Gold Rush said the comment gives them reason to go back to the noise data, decibel readings, to see if the mill was operating on that day. The Commission still needs to go through the EIR’s housing element, at a meeting 7 p.m. Tuesday, Oct. 14, then it will discuss changes and recommendations at later meetings scheduled through February 2009.
Amador Land Usage... Required Permit?
A proposal has been included in the General Plan that would require a conditional use permit for any residential use of Up Country lands East of Dew Drop. The proposal is number 19 in a list of potential changes available for public viewing through the County’s website. In the language of the document, the proposal would apply to, “public and private lands east of Dew Drop presently used or anticipated to be used for passive and commercial recreation, limited managed forestry, mining or grazing activities.” This and other elements of the General Plan have been added and revised based on public input in years of past meetings. Amador County Planning Director Susan Grijalva acknowledged last week that “there is some opposition to what the county and staff have proposed” and expected extended public comment on the issue during a public workshop Saturday and another, Wednesday, October 15th. Two other public meetings are scheduled for October 14th and 16th. “I own my land, and I shouldn’t have to have a use permit to go on my own land,” said Jennifer Cunio Girard, owner of a cabin near Silver Lake.” District 1 Supervisor Elect John Plasse agreed, saying “it is against my core beliefs to devalue or further incumber someone's property with additional regulations.” Plasse is a property owner in affected area. This option has been the only one available throughout the process of developing alternatives A, B, C, and D. Plasse said he didn’t “understand why leaving things as they are can't be an alternative,” said Plasse.”
General Plan Update
Ione City Council Amends Wildflower Agreement
General Plan Update: Deliberation Postponed
The 12th hour of a Land Use Element hearing ended with public input running over the allotted speaking time once again. Deliberation planned by the Amador County Board of Supervisors and its Planning Commission was put on hold. The meeting was adjourned to November 5th in the board chambers. The panel took four hours of public testimony Thursday in the third day of its serial. Jim Conklin, executive director of the Amador County Business Council said he was worried that draft elements in the General Plan might go directly from draft form to the Environmental Impact Report process, but he was glad to hear Planning Director Susan Grijalva say that the process must include more public hearings. Conklin said he is also executive director of the Calaveras County Business Council and has been working with Calaveras on its economic development element and would be happy to share that work with Amador County. He and others noted that the county might also want a separate Agriculture Element, which he said might fit into the economic element. Others suggested a Water Element, for watershed management. Chris Fusano urged that the county remove any tree law from the county plan and use only state law for tree preservation. He also said the term, “where economically feasible” should be part of the entire General Plan. Supervisor Board Chairman Richard Forster said he would like that term for the county too, as the state mandates too many tasks for the county. Supervisor Louis Boitano said, “One of those tasks it to redo your General Plan.” Supervisors and planning commissioners will meet again to deliberate on the Land Use Element, 1 to 5 p.m. Wednesday, November 5 at the supervisors chambers, 800 Court Street in Jackson. Cara Agustin of the county planning office said the “main goal for the board and planning commission is to provide direction to staff on how to proceed with the General Plan.” Another, tentative meeting is set for 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Wednesday, November 12th.
New Homes OK'd Near Camanche
Amador County got the OK for 20 new homes in Lake Camanche Village last week when the state lifted a moratorium on new homes there. The Amador Water Agency announced the lifting of the moratorium. AWA received notice from the California Department of Public Health on October 7th that said, “with the additional source capacity and reliability provided by the (newly installed) Well 14, state regulators will allow up to 20 new service connections in the system in the next year.” The health department halted all new connections in Lake Camanche Village in November of 2006, until the AWA could improve the system’s ability to provide a sustained water supply. Well 14 was completed in August of 2007 and gives an additional 40 percent capacity gain to the Lake Camanche system. AWA General Manager Jim Abercrombie said it was “critical to Lake Camanche property owners that they know whether they will be able to develop their property in the future.” He said the “state has recognized that we have made substantial improvements” to the system, and that AWA “is committed to continuing to develop a reliable, sustainable water supply for out Lake Camanche customers.” The health Department noted concern over diminishing groundwater resources in the Foothills in the current drought and outlined conditions for the 20 new hook-ups. AWA must monitor groundwater conditions and well production rates for evaluation before future hook-ups will be allowed. AWA must continue efforts to fund and complete a groundwater sustainability study in the Camanche area. If water shortages occur, the AWA will implement mandatory conservation practices for residents of Lake Camanche Village as needed to prevent water shortages.
General Plan Meetings
The Amador County Planning Department hosts a series of joint meetings of the planning commission and Board of Supervisors this week, with writing the new General Plan as the final objective. Planners are looking for Supervisors’ direction in the use of a “Habitat Conservation Plan,” or HCP, which is an “implementation measure” by which planners can tailor an overall plan to protect wildlife and habitats in a certain area. Planner Heather Anderson said it is a means of addressing requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and U.S. Fish and Game. Anderson said it is a way of determining if land uses impact something that is federally protected. But one local activist group, the “Amador Citizens for Responsible Government” is encouraging citizens to attend in protest of the HCP. “Spending 2 to 3 million on a Habitat Conservation Plan…would reduce local control of the County’s General Plan and potentially give significant power to Federal and State agencies,” they said in a release. The series of meetings start Tuesday and run Wednesday and Thursday, and will look at land uses all around the county. Standing room only crowds are expected. Day 1 of the serial meeting will be for staff presentations of the meeting’s purpose and background. Day 2 will be for public input and comment. Day 3 will be for planning commission and supervisor deliberation and direction to staff. The meeting, over three days, will be held 1 to 5 p.m. in the Supervisors Chambers, 800 Court Street. The meeting should include planners giving recommendations to supervisors as the meeting progresses.
Plymouth Considers Raising Sewer And Water Rates
The Plymouth City Council could decide today whether to raise its water and sewer rates in order to pay for its water pipeline. Last Thursday’s regular meeting brought offers of pipeline funding from developers and a consultant for the Ione Band of Miwok Indians. Peter Teteishi, consultant for the Ione Miwoks, reminded the city that Tribal Chairman Matthew Franklin had sent an August 5th offering to pay for both the building of the pipeline and the upgrades to the wastewater system, “as part of negotiating a (Municipal Services Agreement),” paying for both, “once our land is taken into trust.” Councilman Greg Baldwin said any discussion would have to wait until the land were taken into trust for the tribe. Bob Reeder of Reeder-Sutherland, developers seeking 1,100 units around Plymouth, sought annexation to the city and said his company would guarantee payments of the interest on a loan to pay for the city’s portion of a pipeline. He said his company in July offered future-year funding from water impact fees, paying 180,000 dollars over 4 years. In the long-term offer, Reeder said his company was “willing to give guaranteed income,” without a home built, that they would take over the loan payment 100 percent. Mayor Jon Colburn said that water and sewer rate hikes would hurt single older women, including one “old lady” who lived on a fixed income and whose utility bills he shared with the council and audience. “There’s an inordinate amount of widows in this town, probably 50,” Colburn said, all living on fixed incomes. Vice Mayor Patricia Fordyce said she has “sat in the audience for years and heard about the poor little old lady who lives down the street,” which the council used in arguing against rate hikes and against capital improvements. Fordyce said “She should be dead by now because I’ve been hearing about her for 20 years.” Councilwoman Patricia Shackleton agreed “to an extent” with Fordyce. Shackleton said it was “terrible to sit up here and vote on these things and make people pay more.” Looking back on when the ditch broke down and townspeople couldn’t have a glass of water without boiling it, she said “we should have raised rates.” On the other hand, she said, “I know a little old lady who ate dog food, who lived on 35 dollars worth of dog food. I don’t see any solution but getting this pipeline.” Fordyce asked Flynn about Reeder’s offer, and whether the city should have a financier look into it. “We’re trying to get as much as we can and they are trying to give as little as they can,” Said Flynn, noting that he would he would talk to Reeder and hopefully find a resolution in the next 45 days “They will pay, the question is when?”