California Transportation Funding
Drought Assistance Program
Assembly Bill 648 Approval
Unemployment Rates
Proposition 6
And now, our continuing report on the Propositions you’ll be deciding on in the November ballot. Today we’ll discuss Proposition 6, which would require at least 965 million to be spent annually on police and local law enforcement. According to Supporters, “Proposition 6 is a comprehensive anti-gang and crime reduction measure that will bring more cops and increased safety to our streets, and greater efficiency and accountability to public safety programs.” Supporters say Proposition 6 “returns taxpayer’s money to local law enforcement without raising taxes.” The proposition includes a number of plans to address crime, including prohibiting bail to illegal immigrants charged with violent or gang related crimes, imposing a 10-year penalty increase on gang offenders, providing GPS equipment for monitoring gang and sex offenders, and increasing penalties for multiples acts of graffiti. But opponents say Prop 6 “writes into law new crimes, increases penalties for old crimes, and mandates more spending…but it provides not a single penny of new funding to pay for it.” Opponents say Prop 6 “wastes money on ineffective programs without accountability” and “disrupts existing crime prevention efforts.” As a result, opponents believe this means “less money for schools, health care, parks, roads or any of the state’s other important priorities.” On November 4th, you’ll have the opportunity to help decide.
Proposition 4
And now, our continuing report on the Propositions you’ll be deciding on in the November ballot. Today we’ll discuss Proposition 4, which would change the constitution to require doctors to notify a parent or guardian 48 hours before performing an abortion for a girl under the age of 18. Supporters say this law would “reduce teen pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases without danger or harm to minors.” Supporters criticize organizations that perform abortions, like Planned Parenthood, of “secrecy” that “enables abuse to continue.” But opponents say “mandatory notification laws may sound good, but…a scared, pregnant teen who can’t go to her parents may…turn to illegal, back alley abortions” and “not all teens live in homes where communication is possible.” Opponents believe “no law can mandate family communication” and that the “state should not be forcing that conversation.” California voters defeated similar propositions in 2005 and 2006. Also known as “Sarah’s Law”, the contentious issue has been frequently debated amongst special interest groups, much like the subject of abortion itself. On November 4th, you’ll have the opportunity to help decide.
Record High Temperatures
Senator Dave Cox
U.S. Forest Service
Proposition 5
And now, our continuing report on the Propositions you’ll be deciding on in the November ballot. Today we’ll discuss Proposition 5, or the Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act, which would expand rehabilitation services for drug offenders in prison, on parole, and in the community. It is estimated that this expansion would require California to spend an extra $1 Billion. Supporters of the Proposition believe the long-term investment in rehabilitation is more beneficial than the $10 Billion California currently spends on prisons every year. “Our State prisons are badly overcrowded,” supporters say, and they add: “Prop 5 offers greater accountability and better treatment for nonviolent offenders.” Supporters believe that “treating violent and nonviolent offenders differently is the smart fix for overcrowded prisons.” Supporters include Dr. Judith Martin from the California Society of Addiciton Medicine and Daniel Macallier, Executive Director for the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice. Prop 5 proposes a three step process that would transfer responsibility for drug treatment amongst non-violent offenders from the prisons to drug counselors and the nonviolent offenders themselves. But according to local opponent and Amador County District Attorney Todd Reibe, “You can’t leave it to people who are in the throes of addiction to determine when their ready to get serious treatment.” Opponents say the Prop will “establish two new bureaucracies with virtually no accountability…that will cost hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars.” Opponents say “the real beneficiaries of Prop 5 are the violent criminals who can escape persecution for their violent acts by claiming they weren’t responsible- or, ‘the meth made me do it.’” On November 4th, you’ll have the opportunity to help decide.