News Archive (6192)
USDA cancels its Sutter Creek “Sierra Cascades Dialog” on rural forest communities
Written by TomAmador County – The U.S. Department of Agriculture last week announced that it has canceled a portion of its “Sierra Cascades Dialog” program that was scheduled for Saturday in Sutter Creek.
The dialog in Sutter Creek, called “Improving Social and Economic Conditions in Rural Forest Communities,” would have been the “third in a series of Dialogs over the coming years to discuss a range of critical issues that affect the Sierra Nevada and the Cascades and people who live, work and recreate there,” according to USDA information on the meeting. The Sutter Creek Dialog was canceled, and will be moved to Sacramento and held on Oct. 13.
The Dialogs focus on the future of national forests, “providing an opportunity for learning, aligned actions, and understanding different perspectives.” Previous Dialogs were “Ecological Restoration” last November, and “Values, Attitudes & Beliefs: Shaping the Assessment for Forest Planning,” in February.
Future Dialog topics include “An All Lands Approach to Fire Protection and Ecological Restoration” and “Utilization of Wood Waste for Multiple Benefits.” Others include “Monitoring & Adaptive Management” and “Changing Climate.”
Michael T. Chapel, the Regional Forester’s Representative USDA Forest Service in Sacramento announced the postponement in an email to participants in the Sierra-Cascades Dialogs. Chapel said the “registration for this event is far lower than our previous meetings,” and “after visiting with representatives from a variety of interests, we have decided to postpone our discussion about improving social and economic conditions in rural communities.”
Chapel said people “may know that we planned this meeting to respond to requests from some of you to move our discussions into the Sierra-Cascades region. Others recommended that we meet on a Saturday to accommodate those who cannot meet during the week.”
He said the “arrangements do not work for the majority of you,” so they “will move the meetings back to McClellan.” Since the summers are busy, they plan to postpone the discussion until the next scheduled Dialog, Oct. 13.
Those who had registered for the June 4 event will be getting a refund sent to them from Sacramento State.
Story by Jim Reece This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Pine Grove’s CYA “Crew 2” marched in the Ione Homecoming parade
Written by TomAmador County – Pine Grove Camp’s “Crew Two,” led by Captain Chris Waters, participated in the city of Ione’s 135th annual Homecoming celebration by marching in the community parade.
Superintendent Mike Roots of the Pine Grove Youth Conservation Camp announced the participation in a release last week.
Officer Mitch Karr drove the Emergency Crew Vehicle while Crew Two, wearing wildland firefighting gear and fully tooled up, walked the route. Roots said “although the Ione Homecoming Parade was relatively short in distance, it was long on public participation and enthusiastic support.” Pine Grove Camp’s wildland firefighters rounded out a number of fire engines, rescue rigs, and assorted fire support vehicles driven by CAL Fire and the city personnel from the Ione Fire Department.
All fire service entries were well received and publicly acknowledged for their continuing public service contribution to the greater community.
Ione’s 135th Homecoming celebration opened Friday, May 13th with a new event called “Holy Smokes! It’s a Rib Cook-off.” There was music by “30 Years After” and “FreeZeout”. During the day, a children’s costume contest, junior frog jump, and a Little League baseball game occurred at the elementary school.
A carnival was held at Howard Park where fireworks lit up the sky when the sun went down. Saturday kicked off with the Bedbug Challenge run and walk, the Cub Scout pancake breakfast and other festive events at Howard Park.
The parade down Main Street began at 10 a.m. with Grand Marshal Dolores Larrigan leading the way. Larrigan said she has participated in the parade for 65 years and “Hats, Horses and Hay” are just her style.
Right after the parade was the ever popular soap box derby. The Saturday night Homecoming dance was held on Main Street from 9 p.m. until midnight.
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Amador County – In an early May public hearing, Ione City Council discussed a draft noise ordinance, which drew criticism from the public.
City Manager Kim Kerr said municipal code only addresses “public nuisances,” and doesn’t apply to every noise complaint, nor do all complaints concern time of day, so interpretation “becomes very subjective.” An ordinance would “remove the subjectivity.”
City Planner Christopher Jordan said the ordinance was drafted from other cities’ ordinances. It included noise decibel limitations, and would require buying a decibel meter and calibrating equipment for $3,100. Kerr said the city had $1,100 invested in the issue so far, including advertising the public hearing.
Kerr said JTS Community rules have been applied to the city but “there was nothing on the books that allowed us to enforce those rules.” She said the council could try to address some scenarios in the ordinance, such as noise from a party at Pardee Lake, or bicycle riders shouting during rides through town.
In public comment, James Nevine complained repeatedly of a neighbor who uses “bullhorns and whistles out in front of the house,” to celebrate birthdays. Laurie Lord said trying to fix a problem for one or two people will “throw a blanket on the rest of us,” though “it would be nice to have guidelines to go by.”
Kerr reiterated that one complaint was not addressed by city code, and was therefore not in the city’s power to resolve. Gary Thomas said it was “going over the edge” with an ordinance. He said he resolved a noise issue with 40 neighbors in an apartment complex, with the help of police, who then spoke to the residents.
Councilman Lloyd Oneto said he would like to level the playing field, but if they “put in more teeth, it could come back to bite you.”
Jack Brotherton said the city should have a budget going into these things,” and “front-end” the budget, so that you don’t have to count the money as you go. He said “somebody celebrating their birthday with a bullhorn at 2 a.m. is unacceptable.” Judy Eisner said she works nights, and “your ordinance wouldn’t allow me to complain.”
Mayor David Plank said they should “make something very simple to address this issue.” Vice Mayor Ron Smylie said letting a good community work out the issue was “better than having a 5-page ordinance.” Kerr said “I agree, but we do have complaints which we can’t resolve at that level.” She said they could make changes and further clarification in city code, but “unfortunately, one line” in the city code about public nuisances “cannot resolve all of the issues.”
Story by Jim Reece This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Amador County – In late April, the Amador Water Agency board of directors voted to oppose the California Water Resources Investment Act, in part because it was an “unfunded mandate.”
AWA General Manager Gene Mancebo at the late April meeting said the directors “voted to join other water agency coalition groups” in opposing California Senate Bill 34, which would enact the California Water Resources Investment Act of 2011. Mancebo told the board that the act would be an unfunded mandate, and it “would impose an assessment on each acre-foot of water sold for residential and agricultural use.”
He said the “bill initially proposed an assessment of $110 per acre-foot of residential use and for each acre of agricultural irrigation,” with the funds generated to be used “to finance a water resources investment program.”
Mancebo said the “dollar amount has been removed from the current version of the bill, but Directors discussed the negative impact of any assessment on Agency water rates, and voted 5-0 to send a letter in opposition.”
Also in the late April meeting, the AWA board of directors declared eight of its trucks as surplus and will sell the trucks through the Agency’s surplus property process. The used vehicles, dating from 1996 to 2001, will be offered for sale first to other government agencies and then to the general public, per a new agency policy approved by the new board. Any trucks not sold at that point will be offered for sale to Agency employees.
A list of the surplus vehicles is available by contacting Cris Thompson or Barry Birge at the Amador Water Agency, at (209) 223-3018.
The AWA board of directors today has two special meetings that will occur before the regular meeting. One, which was announced yesterday, is to discuss Proposition 84 grant implementation, relative to the Urban Water Management Plan, that would be created in conjunction with the East Bay Municipal Utility District. The special meeting is set for 1:30 p.m. today.
The board also was to have a special budget meeting starting at 8 a.m. today to talk about the 2011-2012 fiscal year budget, and the fiscal year capital improvement projects. They also were to discuss fixed asset review, and receive a cash flow projections report.
Story by Jim Reece This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Amador County Joint Plan panel works toward a Draft General Plan
Written by TomAmador County – Among the more than 100 people who attended the Amador County Joint Panel meeting Wednesday were many wearing the red of the Mother Lode Tea Party. All were invited to speak later in the meeting. During public matters not on the agenda, a few people still spoke about the matters that were on the agenda: The General Plan.
Kathy Allen said her group, Amador Citizens for Smart Growth, was unduly criticized for costing the county for making Freedom of Information Act requests, but she said her comment letters of 7 and 13 pages “were in no way monstrous.” She said Amador Business Council “submitted a much larger document.”
Terry Nielsen of Pine Grove said “we moved here to be in the open country” and are strongly against being crammed into clustered, controlled communities. He cited Senate Bill 375 as the bible for the California Environmental Quality Act, and Greenhouse Gas reduction, and said “the law is so revolutionary that California has been going through a real boom in the planning industry.”
Supervisor Ted Novelli pointed out that SB375, the “metropolitan planning” law, is specific to 7 counties, but not Amador County. But he said “certain segments of it could pertain to Amador County.”
Supervisor Chairman John Plasse read a statement from county legal counsel about a recent greenhouse gas ruling, which went against the state in San Francisco. He said AB32 created CEQA, but SB97 amended CEQA to add greeghouse gas emission, which was the basis on which then Attorney General Jerry Brown required the monitoring of greenhouse gasses to be in county General Plans. Plasse said the ruling in San Francisco was against “Cap & Trade,” and the State Resources Board will appeal, which stays the ruling on Cap & Trade, and “unfortunately, we will not be able to address the issue.”
The Panel then turned to several issues that still needed to be rectified. Among those was land use designation on a few properties around the Amador County Airport, which Planner Susan Grijalva said had inconsistencies. One of those was property purchased by the Amador Water Agency to expand its water storage. The land designation was changed to Public Service, as was a 3.26-acre parcel near West Point Bridge on Highway 26. Similarly, the Pine Grove community leach field was designated a Public Service area.
Other land near the airport was discussed, including a 20-acre ranch, whose owners had not been notified of possible designation changes. It was agreed to make a notification of all lands affected by the airport, due to “federally adopted over-flight zones.” Supervisors Louis Boitano and Novelli said they thought the family owned the property before the airport was built.
After taking public comment, the Joint Panel meeting was adjourned to resume at 1 p.m. today.
Story by Jim Reece This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
AWA to discuss fire suppression system participation fees for new homes
Written by TomAmador County – The Amador Water Agency board of directors today will discuss fire suppression fees for new homes, and also will get a presentation on the use of a special tax for its Gravity Supply Line and the infrastructure of the Amador Water System.
The AWA has a regular meeting scheduled for today to discuss a staff recommendation by General Manager Gene Mancebo to direct staff “to charge residential fire suppression system water service connections based on a standard 5/8ths-inch participation fee and monthly service charge.” In a report for today’s meeting, Mancebo also recommended staff be directed to “review water use in accordance” with “water code for water used based on fees paid,” and work on “standard backflow prevention requirements” and public policy for fire suppression systems.
Mancebo in the report said California Building Code effective Jan. 1 requires “automatic sprinkler systems in all new construction of one- and two-family dwellings,” excluding townhouses. He said staff determined that flow of 30 gallons a minute would be needed for sprinklers in new homes, along with 5 gallons a minute flow for domestic use. He said the city of Ione has already enacted code that requires new homes to have the systems, and the AWA now has requests from Ione for the sprinkler service.
The report said staff determined that the flow needed would be a 5/8ths-inch line, and that the new home participation fees for a 5/8ths-inch line would be $11,000, based on the Amador Water System fee structure, compared to a 1-inch line participation fee of $27,500. He said AWS also has a service charge that would apply, of $25 a month for the smaller line, and $49 a month for the larger line.
Also today, the AWA board is scheduled to get a presentation from legal counsel on the use of “Special Tax Fees.” In particular, the presentation would discuss the use of a special tax for the AWA’s proposed Gravity Supply Line project, and for the infrastructure of the Amador Water System.
The board today is also scheduled to get a report from Human Resources Director Karen Gish on new job classifications based on the agency reorganization plan, approved at the last meeting. The AWA’s regular board meeting was to start at 9 a.m. today.
Story by Jim Reece This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Amador County Joint Panel kicks off 13th meeting of its General Plan Update
Written by TomAmador County – More than 110 people attended the first General Plan Update meeting of 2011, with a nearly capacity supervisors chamber. The first meeting of the year of the Joint Panel of Amador County’s Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission was also the panel’s 13th meeting on the topic overall.
The Joint Panel began meeting in 2008, and last met in 2009, then staff went to work preparing the Preliminary Draft General Plan, which County Planner Susan Grijalva and her staff brought back Wednesday for more preliminary work. She said the changes that would come from changing words and the like was not enough to cause the re-circulating of the Environmental Impact Report for comment.
She said the meeting was intended to confirm that the preliminary drafts of the general plan document, glossary and implementation plan “contain the direction previously given to staff” in the dozen previous meetings, and to “identify any item that, if incorporated into the document later in the process, would be of such significance so as to substantially change the project description, thereby necessitating recirculation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report.” She said word changes “aren’t significant enough in the scope of environmental analysis” and that discussion should be held until the Draft General Plan and EIR are released.
Supervisor Chairman John Plasse read a list of minutes from the 10-member Joint Panel’s last 12 meetings, and said: “Who says we’re not transparent?” Grijalva said there were 27 General Plan Advisory Committee meetings held over 2 years, along with workshops in the community. The dozen Joint Panel meetings were held over 2-and-a-half years, and “correspondence was received during all phases.”
Several people spoke during “public matters not on the agenda,” and started to address the General Plan Update, but were asked to refrain from doing so until later. A public speaker’s sign-in sheet was indicated by Grijalva, who also asked that anyone reading from prepared statements could submit their document to Planner Cara Augustin, so that it could more easily be placed into the record of the proceedings.
Eight documents of correspondence were packaged for the Panel, and Grijalva started the meeting by bringing up four areas of concern that staff had found things in the final land use map which needed the panel’s further direction. She said staff had identified “four areas that don’t appear to be consistent with policies that we’ve applied to the rest of the General Plan.”
The meeting, attended by more than 100 people, included many in red signifying membership of the Mother Lode Tea Party Patriots, many of whom signed up for the public comment period. The meeting was scheduled to be continued to today if needed.
Story by Jim Reece This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Pine Grove Camp fire hand crew passed its Spring training exercise
Written by TomAmador County – Mike Roots, Superintendent of the Pine Grove Youth Conservation Camp, announced in a release last week that wards at the camp recently participated in the Spring Fire Readiness Exercise, to prepare for warmer weather.
CYA Lieutenant Wayland in the report said “all Correctional Fire Crews are required to participate in, and successfully complete, a fire readiness exercise prior to the start of the fire season. This year, Pine Grove Camp, along with Washington Ridge and Growlersberg Camps, held a joint exercise on the Bacchi Ranch in Coloma.” The first activity was a “tool-up,” he said, simulating “what occurs upon arrival at a fire.” Within seconds the crew exited the back of a vehicle, “called out their position on the crew, and received their tool, then lined up in crew order awaiting further directions.”
Senior Cal Fire officers “conducted an equipment inspection of each fire fighter and quizzed them, testing their understanding of fire line safety.”
The crew “then moved to another location where their fire shelter deployment skills were evaluated,” Wayland wrote. “Following a briefing and demonstration, the crew simulated deployment under emergency conditions. Captain Chris Waters had devoted hours practicing this life-saving skill and, as a result, everyone was fully deployed within 26 seconds.” Soon after, the crew “struck out on a four-mile hike with full packs, canteens, and sufficient supplies to work on the fire line for 24 hours. Although the temperature was warm and the terrain rolling to hilly, they completed it on time and with considerable ease,” which Wayland said was “a testament to Captain Water’s belief in physical conditioning and constant practice.”
Following a short rest and a snack, the crew “was ready for its biggest and most difficult challenge of the day,” that being “cutting a fire line uphill through dense vegetation.” Wayland said that “line cutting is the most important task for a wildland fire hand crew and is the true test of a crew’s individual fitness and team cohesiveness.”
Wayland said there “are no stars on a hand crew; each member has a specific task which must be performed in sequence and without delay.” While exhausting work, “the firefighters also found it satisfying to look down a 300-foot pathway, cleared down to bare soil, which was choked with brush and trees just minutes before and realize what they had accomplished.”
Even though the crew passed the exercise and is now ready for the 2011 fire season, there was no rest and relaxation. Wayland said the next day, “the crew was back at work, practicing and honing their hiking and firefighting skills.” Wayland said Waters and the other Pine Grove captains “understand that skills practiced during training and daily work are what keep everyone safe on the fire line.”
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Amador County Animal Control seizes 16 neglected miniature horses
Written by TomAmador County – Amador County Animal Control announced Monday that it has recently taken custody of 16 miniature horses, which may be available for adoption.
General Services Administration Director John Hopkins said “recently 16 neglected miniature horses were relinquished into the care of Amador County Animal Control. The horses’ health is being evaluated and all will be available for adoption to homes that are approved by Animal Control.”
Hopkins in a release said “some of the horses may require medical care while all need special attentio¬n.” For adoption information, please contact Animal Control at (209) 223-6378.
Story by Jim Reece This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Supervisors OK rate increase hearings for ACES Franchise Service area 1
Written by TomAmador County – The Amador County Board of Supervisors voted 3-2 Tuesday to set a public hearing for a solid waste service increase in franchise service Area 1, and also to raise rates at transfer stations in Pine Grove and Camanche.
ACES Waste Service requested the increases, while holding of potential rate decreases in service areas Number 2 and 3. They requested waiting a year to be able to get data for a full year’s service in Ione, to save money on a costly audit that would have to be redone on Ione next year. ACES President Paul Molinelli Senior said it would also allow for potential gasoline prices to not have an impact on the company’s cash flow.
Supervisor Brian Oneto and Chairman John Plasse dissented. Oneto said he thought ACES should seek reimbursement for carbon emission upgrades he has made to his fleet. Oneto thought reductions should occur in the service areas where they would apply.
Supervisor Louis Boitano partially agreed, saying “I’m looking for a smoothing effect.” As a ratepayer, he would like a decrease, but not if two months later the company would need a 10 percent increase. Molinelli said “that’s exactly what we’re afraid of.” He noted that “fuel has increased 30 percent since Jan. 1,” and “if it does not go to below $3 a gallon, we are going to have a larger rate increase.”
County Counsel Martha Shaver said “if you are going to have an increase of any amount, you have to go out” with a Proposition 218 notice, which the board approved in the 3-2 vote. They also agreed to send letters telling the customers about costs ACES is “eating” to be in carbon air emissions compliance.
Molinelli said: “We did incur that expense. We ate that cost. We’re here. We’re standing.” It was about $150,000 to $200,000 in the 2-year process. Supervisor Ted Novelli said it should be an “itemized specialty,” reimbursable under the franchise contract, and Oneto repeatedly asked why it was not sought in surcharges by ACES. Molinelli said “we’re done. The thing is, we will never buy another vehicle again that is non-compliant.” Oneto said: “Until they change the requirements.”
The board, voting 3-2, approved sending a Prop 218 notice for the Service Area 1 rate increase, and set a public hearing for July 12. They also declined a recommended 1% rate change threshold, and agreed to have the Admin Committee work on a draft letter with ACES to tell customers about the carbon compliance costs.
Story by Jim Reece This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.