News Archive (6192)
By Jim Reece -
Volunteers filled their respective Amador County party headquarters office this week as Democrats and Republicans geared up for the final stretch into Election Day 2008, Tuesday, November 4. Candidates of the second election of the New Millennium likely need no further introduction at this point, but as McCain and Obama gird up their loins, the same occurs in races around Amador. Said to be “non-partisan,” – pretty much only in name – the races locally nevertheless separate many of the candidates by the two major parties. Both of the major parties, Democrats and Republicans, have headquarters staffed by volunteers in Amador County. The Amador Republican Party is in Martell and the Amador Democratic Party is in Jackson. The Democratic Headquarters sells bumper stickers and buttons for the various races from the top down, that is, down to local races that have stickers and fliers on the front window. Those include Bill Condrashoff, who is running for the Amador Water Agency, and Keith Sweet and Judy Jebian, who are both running for the Jackson City Council. The Republican displays focused on bigger races, McCain and Palin and Congressman Dan Lungren’s reelection bid, along with Jack Sieglock for Assembly, who faces Democrat Alyson Huber in the District 3 race.
And now, our continuing report on the Propositions you’ll be deciding on in the November ballot. Today we’ll discuss Proposition 2, sponsored by the Humane Society, which would outlaw caging practices that prevent farm animals from lying down, standing up, turning around or extending their limbs. Proponents describe this as a “moderate measure that stops cruel and inhumane treatment of animals.” They site what they see as an increasing number of factory farms that “cut corners and drive family farmers out of business when they put profits ahead of animal welfare and our health.” Proponents also note the numerous supporters of this Proposition, including Democratic and Republican leaders, the American Public Health Association, and the National Catholic Rural Life Conference. The Sacramento Bee, one of the opponents to the measure, says that, “California doesn’t have much of a pork or veal industry, so this measure would mainly affect caging of egg-laying chickens.” Opponents see Prop 2 as “unnecessary, risky and extreme.” They say that by eliminating the modern housing systems that incorporate these practices, you are increasing the chances of salmonella contamination and the spread of Avian flu. Opponents say California’s eggs will be more expensive and thousands of jobs will be lost. They also fear that Prop 2 could prompt many egg producers to relocate to outside states and Mexico. While Proposition 2 could have a significant economic impact, the Humane Society is appealing to voters to vote yes on moral grounds. On November 4th, you’ll be the one to help decide.
Today will be the first in our series on statewide propositions set for the November ballot. Every day throughout the coming week’s newscasts, we’ll bring you the details of Propositions 1A through 12 and how they could affect you. Today we’ll focus on Proposition 1A, which would provide nearly 10 billion in bonds for a high-speed rail network that would initially link the Bay Area, the Central Valley and Southern California. The measure authorizes the State to sell 9.95 billion in general obligation bonds to fund construction activities and passenger rail system improvements. These bonds will not raise taxes. Proponents of the measure see this as a “safe, convenient, affordable and reliable alternative” that “will bring California electric-powered High-speed Trains running up to 220 miles an hour on modern tracks safely separated from other traffic.” They highlight that the proposed train could remove “12 billion pounds of CO2” and create “nearly 160,000 construction jobs and 450,000 jobs in related industries” in addition to providing a match for at least 9 billion dollars in federal funding and private investment. But opponents see this as “a boondoggle that will cost taxpayers nearly 20 billion dollars in principal and interest.” In their opinion, “the State already has over 100 billion in voter approved bonds and our bond rating is already among the worst in the nation.” Finally, they point out that the money will be controlled by “politicians and bureaucrats” with “no reporting requirements so the public can see how the money is spent.” Popular opinion dictates that the State needs clean alternatives to air and freeway travel, and that the Central Valley needs economic development. But opponents say this proposition would pull up to 647 million from the General Fund without oversight. On November 4th, you’ll have the opportunity to decide.