By Alex Lane -

And now, our continuing report on the Propositions you’ll be deciding on in the November ballot. Today we’ll discuss Proposition 2, sponsored by the Humane Society, which would outlaw caging practices that prevent farm animals from lying down, standing up, turning around or extending their limbs. Proponents describe this as a “moderate measure that stops cruel and inhumane treatment of animals.” They site what they see as an increasing number of factory farms that “cut corners and drive family farmers out of business when they put profits ahead of animal welfare and our health.” Proponents also note the numerous supporters of this Proposition, including Democratic and Republican leaders, the American Public Health Association, and the National Catholic Rural Life Conference. The Sacramento Bee, one of the opponents to the measure, says that, “California doesn’t have much of a pork or veal industry, so this measure would mainly affect caging of egg-laying chickens.” Opponents see Prop 2 as “unnecessary, risky and extreme.” They say that by eliminating the modern housing systems that incorporate these practices, you are increasing the chances of salmonella contamination and the spread of Avian flu. Opponents say California’s eggs will be more expensive and thousands of jobs will be lost. They also fear that Prop 2 could prompt many egg producers to relocate to outside states and Mexico. While Proposition 2 could have a significant economic impact, the Humane Society is appealing to voters to vote yes on moral grounds. On November 4th, you’ll be the one to help decide.