Error
  • JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 62
Sunday, 04 March 2007 22:54

Senator Dave Cox Comments On Transportation Commission Funds Agreement

Written by 
Rate this item
(0 votes)

slide21slide22 Last week’s victory in funding from the California Transportation Commission was hard fought behind the scenes by our elected officials Senator Dave Cox and Assemblyman Alan Nakanishi. One of the major issues with this Corridor Mobility Improvement Funding under Prop 1B is a funding issue seen through out all state funding, transportation to education, the battle between rural and  urban areas in the state. Senator Dave Cox comments on the vital funding allocation made last week and the urban versus rural issue.(59 second audio)end am Slide 1,Cox2)265 Million 3) LA.SF 4) Rebuild 5)CTC applauded if you opt to drive a SUV, instead of a more environmentally friendly car, in California you may have to pay extra for the privilege. If passed new legislation by Assemblyman Ira Ruskin, (D)Redwood City, would add a surcharge to the price of new vehicles sold in California based on the car's carbon emissions. The surcharge would range from $100 to $2,500 depending on the carbon emission level. The goal is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which experts say contribute to global warming.

slide23 slide25 “This is an incentive program," said Ruskin. "It gives people the incentive to buy cleaner vehicles."  The surcharge would apply to many heavy duty trucks, SUVs, muscle cars and luxury vehicles. Proceeds would be used to fund a "clean car discount" program, which would help subsidize car buyers who purchase clean burning or low emission vehicles. "We have to take action to give people the opportunity to vote with their wallets and to make consumer choices that reduce greenhouse gas emissions," Ruskin said. "This is a market based solution that preserves and enhances consumer choice." But Ruskin's definition of a "market-based solution" differs strongly from the auto industry's. "If it was a market based bill he wouldn't need legislation," said Brian Maas, director of Government Affairs for the California Motor Car Dealers Association. Maas calls the car surcharge a "Robin Hood" bill because it takes money away from people who can afford to buy more expensive cars and gives it to people who purchase less expensive, fuel-efficient vehicles. "It's one thing to provide an incentive, but it's another thing to say now we're going to penalize folks on the back end," Maas said. Ruskin argues that his legislation, AB 493, would still give car buyers many different vehicle options. Based on 2004 models, Ruskin says the Honda Oddessy and Dodge Caravan would not be subject to the proposed surcharge, but the Lincoln Town Car and Dodge Viper would face additional surcharge fees. Ruskin’s bill would apply to 2011 model year cars.

Read 1092 times Last modified on Friday, 28 August 2009 02:08