Error
  • JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 62
Sunday, 24 June 2007 23:35

Air District Proposes Fee Raise: Impacts 110 Businesses Who Operate Equipment...

Written by 
Rate this item
(0 votes)
slide3Next week the Amador Air District Board will be holding a public hearing on proposed rule changes to district regulations that directly impact 110 local businesses that operate equipment that generates and or controls contaminants. Amador Air District’s Air Pollution Control Officer, Jim Harris, explained, “These proposed rule changes are related to the fees we charge permitted sources for permits to operate equipment…” He added that he is proposing that those fees be raised this year.

slide4 The proposed changes impacts Air District Rules 600 and 601. Rule 600 which relates to the Filing Fee states that, “Every applicant for an Authority to Construct or Permit to Operate shall pay a filing fee of $202.80 per permit unit.  If an application is canceled, or is denied, as such denial becomes final; the filing fee required herein shall not be refunded nor applied to any subsequent application.” The filing fee was formerly 156. Rule 601 applies to the Permit Fee for the equipment and states that every permit holder must pay an annual fee for issuance of each permit fee for a price also of $202.80. In addition to the annual filing fee the permit holder must furthermore pay a fee based on the annual emissions from their facility. The rule now states, that “each ton of emissions or part thereof for described air contaminants shall be assessed.” The Fees per ton are as follows: For Total organic gases, except those compounds containing sulfur, Gaseous sulfur compounds, expressed as sulfur dioxide,

slide7 Particulate matter, Oxides of nitrogen, expressed as nitrogen dioxide are all proposed to be $30.42 a ton; Carbon monoxide $8.45; Toxic air contaminants $42.25; and finally excess emissions during variance period are proposed to be $42.25 at ton as well. Prior to the proposed fees the Air District charged $23.40 per ton for emissions with the exception of Carbon Monoxide for which they charged $6.50. There are also supplemental fees imposed on vapor recovery nozzles at $47.32 per nozzle. Harris states, “The reason that we are increasing the fee is for the operation budget of the district to perform the work that is mandated for us to perform and we need to be able to pay for our staff.” Harris added, “At some point in the future, we have to hire more staff and hopefully this will be a step in that direction.” Harris went on to explain that with the approved and impending development there are a lot of concerns that the Air District must address. “We need to an engineer to be able to address some of those concerns for development, for growth and to mitigate any potential emissions that will result from that growth.”  He concluded by saying that even with the fee rate, “Our fees are very inexpensive compared to other air district throughout the state.” The Air District meeting will be held Tuesday June 26th at 1:30pm at the Administration Center at 810 Court Street.

Read 513 times Last modified on Friday, 28 August 2009 02:08